Tuesday, September 4, 2012

28: Golden River (a.k.a. The Golden Thread; a.k.a. Subarnarekha – Original Bengali title)



             Not many Indian films have had the impact on me that Ritwik Ghatak’s Golden River (1965) had.  Watching the film earlier today was dreamlike.  Indian films often have that effect on me, but never in this particular combination of emotion and degree.  Indian cinema has a taste that combines so many flavors, but is unique unto itself.  Often it resembles one of two genres, both of which were heavily influential on the early Indian film movement.  Some enjoyable and even remarkable films from the subcontinent take much of their look and feel from the Hollywood musical of the 1950s, and it is well-known that these pictures are adored by domestic fans and have a growing international following.  While I like some of these pictures, I prefer, however, the Indian films that barrow a great deal from Italian neorealist works.  Golden River is a film of this variety, and I must say that it measures up to, and even surpasses, the Italian masters in many regards. 
            Like so many of those Italian films, the central element of this story is a family desperate to stay intact in whatever way they can.  However, the added cultural distinctions caused by India’s Caste system lay the foundation here for a deeper -rooted tragedy than that of the neorealist films that dealt with postwar poverty.  Indeed, characters in this film often confront the fact that they are regarded as less than human by their surrounding society.  This element is brought to the forefront early in the picture, as it begins with the news of Gandhi’s death reaching a refugee camp outside Calcutta.  With human rights leaders now the target of assassins, the Bengali expatriates hold out little hope for triumph over their greedy landlords.  Though conditions have the prospect of improving, and a school has been established, Ishwar (Abhi Bhattacharya) decides to leave with his younger sister, Shita, and take a job in a provincial factory.  
            Dismissed by his older sister and brother-in-law as a deserter of the refugee cause, Ishwar sets out with Shita and the orphan boy Ibhiram.  The small band makes it to the province only to discover that conditions there are not much better.  Still, Ishwar is determined to make the most of the job he is offered and hope that there will be room for advancement.  He seeks a better life for his adopted brother as well, sending Ibhiram away to be educated despite his low-caste status. 
            Years later, when Ibhiram has completed his schooling, he returns to the province.  While there he reveals his love for Shita, and the two decide to be married.  Ishwar will have nothing of it however, and he quickly decides to send Ibhiram to engineering school in Germany.  Shortly thereafter, a chance encounter with the adopted boy’s mother reveals to the factory community that Ibhiram is an imposter.  Rather than suffer humiliation and despair, the young man and his adopted sister elope on the eve of her wedding to a man who could secure the family’s status. 
            As years pass, the couple, now with a child, do all they can to live independently of their older brother, but financial troubles cause them to discuss contacting him.  In despair, Shita swears that she would rather commit suicide than rely on Ishwar.  Though conditions eventually improve, trouble never seems to be far away from any of the family members, and the story, from its beginning, seems destined to end in tragedy.
            Ghatak’s gift as a director here is that he understands his story needs no embellished flourishes.  What he’s written stands on its own merit, and he needs only for his actors to deliver on the words he’s committed to the page.  He draws fine work from all of his leads, even the younger children in earlier scenes, and uses close ups to great effect.  The iconic American director John Ford said that there wasn’t any secret to great directing, that all you had to do was “photograph the people’s eyes.”  Ghatak takes this philosophy to heart, and indeed at times his characters’ words seem to spring forth not from their mouths but from their pupils. 
            The dream feeling created by other Indian films comes from the colors and the movement of the performers and the camera.  In this movie, the dreamlike effect comes from the eyes.  In each of his characters, they are expressive and vivid.  They convey rage, disappointment, longing, love, and most of all sorrow.  This is a sad film, but sad in a way too beautiful to describe.  It has music, but is not a musical, and passion, but is not a love story.  Many viewers looking to try out Indian cinema start with Satyajit Ray’s Apu Trilogy.  That’s where I began, but I wish I’d started here.  What a pity that this film is largely overlooked, and that I had to go to youtube to find it.  Surely anyone who sees it there, with its poor transfer and somewhat illegible subtitles, will agree that it’s due for the remastering treatment.

Language: Bengali
Runtime: 121 Minutes
Available @Youtube.com

Grade: 3 Hats Off       

0 comments:

Post a Comment